Democrats in Congress are trying to codify the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) 2014 “ambush elections” rule into law. On February 28, 2023, Congressional Democrats reintroduced the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act (H.R. 20, S. 567), which would make the ambush elections rule the law of the land, infringing on worker and employer rights.
In December 2014, the Obama-era “ambush elections” rule made dramatic changes to the Board’s long-standing union representation election procedures through which employees vote on unionization. The rule, which went into effect in April 2015, was designed to speed up elections in order to increase union density and dues revenue streams. This was done at the expense of employees, however, who, due to the rule’s rushed time frames, are denied the opportunity to hear from both sides of the debate prior to voting. The rule also severely undermined employers’ free speech and due process rights as well as their ability to present facts and views on the union at issue and unionization generally. The rule:
The rule shortened the time between a union filing a petition for election and the NLRB holding that election from the previous median time of 38 days to the current 23 days. If fully implemented, the rule could impose elections in as short as 14 days, effectively limiting employers’ ability to communicate with employees and encouraging “back door” organizing.
In order to undo the damages caused by this rulemaking, the Trump-era NLRB issued two Final Rules restoring balance to the election process. In December 2019, the Board issued its Representation Case Procedures Final Rule. The Final Rule includes “clarifications to procedures prior to an election that better ensure the opportunity for litigation and resolution of unit scope and voter eligibility issues” and “permit[s] parties additional time to comply with the various pre-election requirements instituted in 2014.” CDW supported the changes made by the Final Rule and submitted comments on the Board’s initial Request for Information seeking public input on the impact of the ambush elections rule on employer and employee rights. While five provisions of the Final Rule were blocked by the US District Court in May 2020, the court did not vacate the rule in its entirety, allowing the Board to move forward with implementing the majority of the rule’s changes. A list of those changes, which went into effect on May 31, 2021, was provided by the NLRB in its press release announcing implementation.
Additionally, in March 2020, the Board issued its Election Protection Final Rule, which made three critical changes to the Board’s procedures. The Final Rule eliminated the current blocking-charge policy, which paused union decertification elections if an Unfair Labor Practice charge was filed against the employer until the charge was settled; the Board will now allow decertification elections to be held but will either impound or count the votes, depending on the nature of the charge. The Final Rule also created a 45-day window for employees to file for a decertification election if their employer voluntarily recognizes a union, ensuring workers have a voice in their representation. Finally, the Final Rule requires a union in the construction industry to prove they have majority support from workers before a collective bargaining agreement or voluntary recognition can be established. CDW submitted comments in support of the Board’s rulemaking proposal in January 2020. Unfortunately, the NLRB under President Biden is attempting to reverse these important changes through a new notice of proposed rulemaking. CDW will file comments on this misguided policy decision.
While Democrats in Congress are trying to force through the PRO Act, Republicans are working to prevent implementation of the rule. In the 115th Congress, they introduced the Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act (H.R. 2776, S. 1350) and the Employee Privacy Protection Act (H.R. 2775), all of which CDW supported. We strongly encourage Congress to quickly reintroduce and pass these or similar bills into law while halting any efforts to impose the PRO Act or the Board’s new proposed rulemaking on workers, employers, and the American economy.
Please see our resources page for more information on this issue.